Categories
technology

Is Alexa a Google-beater?

They may be a bit cagey about their popularity relative to the almighty Google but there’s no disputing that Alexa does a damn good job of analysing domain popularity. This is quantitatively different from analysis of link relevance performed by Google. Amazon’s search engine is often useful as a mechanism of finding sources of knowledge, opinion or just plain stuff that are unknown to you but have been tried and trusted by others. Google is better at finding the needle in the haystack. The breadth of it’s search is great at detecting that one useful link from an ocean of fractured factums.

alexa_logo

I guess the feature that excites (no pun intended) me most about Alexa is their Web Search Platform. Released in December of 2005, this enables developers to roll their own search engines, providing them with programmatic access to over 5 billion indexed pages through a nifty web service API. This is more than just a web API to retrieve basic alexa searches in a standardised form. It’s enables the creation of search applications which operate directly on defined subsets of the Alexa search space, consume alexa resources and flexibly publish results. DB programmers can think of it as the coolest stored procedure mechanism in the world today.

Categories
technology

Clever idea from Google

Just reading Planet PHP and learned some interesting info about Google Calendar, which I started using last week. Apparently you can aggregate your calendar with friends/associates using RSS. Now that’s a brilliant feature. Using RSS as the event syndication mechanism is really smart. Now I can use my calendar to effectively schedule meetings and can also incorporate that scheduling into the tool of my choice using RSS. With the right applications RSS can be great people management tool.. I’m going to christen this “org casting”.

Categories
humour

Waghorne in the wings

I got a real laugh from Sicilian Notes this morning. Myers is gone and Ireland’s favourite right-of-centre blogger Richard Waghorne seems to be offering his candidacy for the job. I wonder which prescient Sir/Madam editor editted this Wikipedia entry? I may have misinterpreted Richard’s gist but I’m sure the thought has crossed his mind :). Actually, this isn’t a bad idea at all as there’s more than a passing similarity tween their styles and ideologies. You saw it here first! If Richard starts opining on the Great War he’s a shoe-in for the job.

Categories
politics

sponsoring revisionism

This is old news but I’ve only really gotten a big buzzing bumble bee in my bonnet about it recently. Possibly because of the SouthPark debacle. I’m sure some readers, including Miles, have a skeleton or two in the closet. What if you could change the past or just make everybody forget about whatever activity/aspect of yourself you find embarassing. Well the good old church of scientology has adopted a very pragmatic approach to this particular dilemna. A few years back it sent a nasty C&D letter to google telling them to censor search results linking to sites which discredit scientology. Now let’s be nice and impartial about that. This was an act of pure unadulterated evil. Thanks to Dan Brown it seems half the world thinks they’re personally related to Jesus but the scientologists have to censor Google. The approach of messrs. Brin and Page was masterful (microsoft-like?) in it’s acrobatics, ensuring that the reason for censorship is out in the open through the innovative ChillingEffects website. Here’s a full list of the scientologist’s gripes, generally focussing on copyright infringement on material relating to their technologies.
What I missed at the time (cos I’m so s-l-o-w) was that the archives of various scientologist debunking pages such as Xenu.net have actually been expunged from the Internet Archive. So when future generations examine what the opinion was in the greater digital community in 2006 about Scientology, large swathes of negative opinion will not be available.
This is awfully sinister. Remember Orwell’s 1984 anyone? From the Internet Archive’s own pages.


The Internet Archive is working to prevent the Internet — a new medium with major historical significance — and other “born-digital” materials from disappearing into the past. Collaborating with institutions including the Library of Congress and the Smithsonian, we are working to preserve a record for generations to come.< The Internet Archive is opening its collections to researchers, historians, and scholars. The Archive has no vested interest in the discoveries of the users of its collections, nor is it a grant-making organization.

There’s little point in maligning a group of well meaning academics who run a not-for-profit organisation. About as much point in making them censor their archive, suppressing (that greatly abused word in scientology) dissenting voices. But there you go, all’s fair in love, war and cultdom.
I have little problem with any religious belief. Most can be made to appear silly when subjected to cold and rational scrutiny. This in itself does not make any article of faith untrue, it just means that it’s something that cannot be proven and is taken on faith. After all atheism is a belief structure. It’s intrinsic to humanity to believe in something even if it’s the absence of a god, dog or a flying spaghetti monster. Intuitively it’s a divisive rather than a spiritual path to censor those with a different opinion to your own. I guess I’d like to grow old in a world where the Internet enables safe freedom of thought and expression. A little bit of anarchy keeps the asylum a safe place, without it the pressure builds up and leads to lawlessness & war. Think of the internet as a democratic safety valve.