Categories
humour

More geek humour

Murphy’s law is alive, well and stalking me at the moment. So I’ve been reading some geeky humour to cheer me up. Found this on madbean.com.
You know you are a nerd when…
When a friend is having internet connectivity problems and this is the IM conversation you have:
(True story.)

** bph is now available
bph: ACK?
mlq: ACK. ACK?
bph: ack

Thanks to Kieran for throwing this one my way. The comments are even better or worse depending on your point of view. ciao 4 now…

Categories
technology

What’s superer than 3G

Super 3G is the new faster than fast, whiter than white, icecold, hot as hell and totally groovy wireless transmission standard which is going to provide wireless speeds 10 times faster than 3G. The only catch is that it’s not even a specification at the moment, rather an initial agreement between the major mobile operators and phone companies to develop a new services by 2009 (with technology optimistically concluded by 2007). I’ll believe that when I see it but I suppose much of the ground work has been laid out in the latest releases of the UMTS standard. This service should enable all kinds of exotic scenarions like seamless roaming of continuous video feeds and the like. WOW! The reg has more information and gizmodo remarks on it as does ITWEB
The half-empty cynic in me still wonders whether this investment in hugely expensive new transmission technology is justified given that
“most wireless operators with 3G licenses have not made a profit on their high-speed wireless services after spending billions on licenses
Still all is not lost as according to the reg…

“In the nearer term, UK-based mobile operator mmO2 said in early December that it will launch a “super-fast” 3G network in 2005, promising speeds faster than current fixed broadband levels. The mobile operator, which has yet to launch its main consumer 3G service, said it will offer high-speed downlink packet access (HSDPA) technology and Internet Protocol Multimedia Services (IMS) with download speeds of 3.6Mbps, which will increase to 14.4Mbps as handsets become available.”

Categories
technology

Sharman lawsuit rages on

Just read this over on the reg. It looks like Sharman & the music industry (ARIA or the Australian Recording Industry Association in this case) have finally agreed what information from the Feb 2004 data seizures can be used in court. I know this is a complex issue and file-sharing networks don’t necessarily have to be used for illegal purposes but ask yourself the following question:
Besides illegal copies of music and software what else do you look for on P2P filesharing networks?.

Personally I think P2P technology is fantastic. The self-organising and self-healing nature of many of these networks is a percursor for the next generation of internet architecture & design. As autonomics becomes an important field of IT research in the future P2P networks such as Free Net and Bit-Torrent will be recognised as a true paradigm-shift, to use that corny and overused phrase. Also the capabilities of a network such as OceanStore are phenomenal. There’s a real pioneering spirit there and it’s wonderful to be a small part of it. It’s also unfair for the music industry to blame technologists when they’re clearly trying to protect their market in the face of cheap/free technology for recording and distribution. Perhaps, they’ve forgotten that it was a series of technological evolutions and revolutions that led to the creation of the industry in the first place. Thank you Edison, Dolby, Philips Electronics et al. Technological change is an inevitable and those that don’t move with it become industrial dinosaurs whose SEC filings are dug up by corporate paleontologists in the future as they try to piece together “What ever happened to that company industry?” So how will the industry evolve? I’m not sure but here’s some plausible statements:

  • Media distribution and playback technologies will be all-digital within the next 10 years
  • DRM cryptographers and cryptologists will keep pace with eachother, leading to a stalemate situation where ever more draconian DRM initiatives are met with ever more sophisticated mechanisms for by- passing them
  • The availability of a free and relatively unmonitored distribution channel (the internet) will ensure that illegal media distribution does not die out. Normally law-abiding citizens will simply ‘opt out’ of legitimate media distribution schemes.
  • Many emerging artists will directly sell media over the internet for very low prices, cutting out the industry middleman
  • Major artists who’ve already made enough money will embrace internet distribution as a way to gain greater artistic freedom
  • Media costs will tumble as a result. A combination of trade agreements (European Community and Worldwide) and a cheap distribution channel, will standardise media costs so music, films etc. are available for the same basic price throughout the world
  • Firesharing networks will continue to be popular and will resist attempts to shut them down. Americans will come to view secure and anonymous information distribution technologies as they currently do guns control. Laws that curtail the availability and use of those technologies will be viewed as undemocratic and an impediment to free speech.
  • The AOL/Time Warner merger will finally start to make sense as such a conglomerate could recoup distribution costs through it’s ownership of both the media rights and the distribution channel
  • Apple’s flat rate iTunes service will be the model for music distribution services for years to come
  • Internet and Mobile Network Service Provider billing systems will become much more sophisticated to allow for differentiated service charges and itemised content billing.
  • A beleaguered media industry will successfully lobby governments for other mechanisms for revenue generation, probably leading to direct media taxation based on media bandwidth usage
  • In the future everybody will be a published artist

Feel free to comment…

Categories
books

Debunking the debunkers

It’s very amusing that when you search for information about the da vinci code using google many of the hints are catholic or christian websites with information debunking the book. It’s amazing how much time and effort is currently being devoted to debunking Dan’s debunking of catholic and christian teachings. It’s reignited a millenia old debate. In his own way Brown has probably done many churches a power of good by forcing them to examine and succinctly state their beliefs. Without wanting to go into a huge debate on this topic I’m going to make 2 salient points:

  1. History IS written by the winners
  2. All historical records are incomplete in the same way that all stories are told subjectively

It’s a great pity then that many of the responses and da vinci debunks are absolute in their criticism. The authors are in possession of the absolute and correct interpretation of sacred texts, much like the gnostics they criticise. Examples of critics oversights include failure to acknowledge the potential veracity of St. Philips gospel description of Jesus and Mary Magdalene being companions and Jesus “kissing her on the mouth”. And less subjectively, all criticisms that I’ve seen so far fail to acknowledge the undeniable fact of the dimunition of women’s status in society and the clergy by christian religions. The other great pity of is that Brown himself has a powerful message of tolerance which is being missed in the righteous clamour to attack both the author and his very entertaining and thought provoking book. The spirit of The Inquistion lives on in the minds of those whose faith cannot stand query or criticism.