Category: films

The alternative title for this blog post is “Why Cosmo Landesman’s reviews in the Sunday Times are a complete waste of time.”. This is not the first time this has occured to me. He writes well but his views are often uninformative. There have been many instances when Mr. Landesman made a dramatic attempt to show his artfulness and artiness with a willfully bad review of a good if populist movie. However, his review of the latest Batman movie is excrement. R & I saw it last week and we both thought it was marvellous for the most part. Indeed, R never liked comic book adaptations but was surprised at how good a movie it was, transcending its pulp genre with stunning camerawork, great acting, some neat plot twists and good dialogue. Let’s not forget that the movie has to overcome the premise that a grown man wants to dress up as a bat, yet it does so convincingly. Heath Ledger’s joker is almost as good as advertised and contrasted nicely with Day Lewis’ Daniel Plainview in “There will be blood” which we also saw last weekend.
Indeed, The Dark Knight may be as good a movie as Paul Anderson’s oscar winner. This is due in part to the former exceeding and transcending expectations while the latter being overhyped.
Mr. Landesman would have you believe that the Dark Knight is spoiled by politically correct yet implausible vexing on the part of the hero about whether he is blameworthy for the deaths of innocents at the hands of his nemesis. This ignores a large and plausible part of the plot whereby the joker calls on our bat obsessed hero to publicly unmask himself. The review appeared dismissive, glib and ultimately unworthy of the spectacle provided by the Nolan brothers.
On the other hand his review of the X Files gives it the same 2 star rating. To say that these movies were on a par is about as sensible as suggesting the moon is made of a refined extra -mature cheddar. It’s clearly edam. The X Files is a woefully mediocre movie. It’s not terrible but its flaws are so large they stick in your craw, upsetting digestion for hours after the movie is finished. On first inspection you’d think Billy Connolly would be a terrible choice as a paedophile priest “blessed” with some kind of sixth sense. Actually he’s rather good in this slightly hammy role. Nor is the problem “a lack of ideas” as attributed by Cosmo Landesman. The basic premise which drives the plot is actually fine. The problem is that the movie has no idea what its about.
There’s a smattering of love story but it feels phoney. Why, after the series ended, do two lovers who’ve been living together for over a year still refer to themselves by their surnames? This conceit of the earlier episodes of the show is gone by the feature length denoument. Why is there so much time spent on the sick kid? He’s a shallow plot device. It doesn’t work. Why do we learn so little about the techniques and motivations of the limb transplanting bad guys. They’re definitely cartoon baddies as we’re afforded nothing in the way of character development and there’s little clue as to why they’re practicing their abominations. (always liked that word :-)) There are interminable scenes of implausible emotional angst between the two leads, where Scully decides she might have to leave Mulder because of all this “darkness”. This comes across as more high-grade crapola. Appaling and silly character development for the leads. Having watched the TV serious which was so brilliantly scripted and directed by Carter, Wong and Morgan, I can’t believe 10-13 productions couldn’t do so much better.
“I want to believe” feels like it was directed and most particularly editted by a committee, without a single autocratic vision to guide them. Even the wrong vision would have been better than the mish-mash that unfolds.
However, this isn’t an awful movie. The acting is good, most of the dialogue is fine and there are some witty moments. Also, the series has been on tv recently so anyone dismising this as the review of someone who has halcyon romanticised recollections of the series is mistaken. Many episodes of the series really were that good. Genre-defining and defying in the way that only the Nolan brothers and Guilermo del Toro have achieved in recent memory.
With a clearer focus this could have been a very good movie. All the ingredients for a first rate omelete are there 🙂 As it is we’ve been left with a disappointment which is leading to some even more caustic reviews at rotten tomatoes.