- @adrianweckler obviously anarchy ain't what if used to be in reply to adrianweckler #
- iPhone spell correction can be misleading when you're in a hurry #
- Great if frosty walk in Tramore, co. Waterford. Then we had to rescue my sister when her car battery died. Like a superhero or something 🙂 #
- @Eirepreneur you still seeing #avatar on Monday? Make sure you see the 3D version. Amazing in reply to Eirepreneur #
- Thanks to top gear I now know the RAC produces a "carfum" called "eau de voiture" http://tinyurl.com/ycjmdql #
- 4th fried breakfast In a row. This is life on the edge! #
- @fionahaughney Nps. Dropped Roisin to Ballinakill & went for a walk. Thought I heard your voice tbh then saw the car a few minutes later. in reply to fionahaughney #
- Why does the Big Issue seller want to jump out in front of us an icy pavement? Now that's hard sell #
- @mrs_bopp thanks Mrs. Bopp. I'm sure it won't be my last rant before christmas in reply to mrs_bopp #
- @EvertB @mrs_bopp true but "The Climb" is aimed at young teen girls as far as a I can see. It's a win for "fogeys" :)O in reply to EvertB #
- @mrs_bopp @EvertB too right. I'm off to burn down my own christmas tree 😀 in reply to mrs_bopp #
- @EvertB IHRC recommendation in 07 was that samples for acquitted/released persons should be disposed asap http://tinyurl.com/ygd658y in reply to EvertB #
- Nice to see the government isn't going to following IHRC recommendations about the National DNA database http://tinyurl.com/ygd658y #
- @EvertB It would be relatively straightforward to fix the legislation but DAhern always thinks he knows best in reply to EvertB #
- @abetson could you imagine the fuck up the gov would make of regulating a Secure DNS database? in reply to abetson #
- @abetson the irish gov are working hard to bring us back to the good ol' days of slime in reply to abetson #
- @mrs_bopp presumption of innocence doesn't apply in all jurisdictions. You're thinking of Blackstone's formulation http://tinyurl.com/6qqwfe in reply to mrs_bopp #
- @abetson Something like a DNA database needs to be implemented very sensitively. Otherwise the innocent will suffer. in reply to abetson #
- @mrs_bopp my gf @rosbunny is the "family law expert" on @ghook's show. She doesn't think my rants are radio-friendly #
- @abetson accepted but our legal system has a tenet which aims to minimise that suffering. in reply to abetson #
Category: Uncategorized
Twitter Updates for 2009-12-20
- Anyone else trying to watch the steorn livestream at http://bit.ly/17u0ho ? "offline" again. Ya'd think with all that energy they have .. 🙂 #
- Fantastic I'm receiving a jittery stream of free energy from #steorn 🙂 #
- @IrishChieftain whatever happens I sincerely believe that there's a concerted campaign to discredit non-carbon energy sources in reply to IrishChieftain #
- @steornorbo what's the resolution of the V & A probes? #
- @IrishChieftain exactly and each large power/country wants to control the future of energy production. in reply to IrishChieftain #
- Watching Louis Theroux interview extreme wrestlers who cut themselves with barbed wire. Even Louis looks shocked #
- Not doing very much at all today. Gorged on TopGear episodes and did a crossword or 2. Time for a walk! #
- Early 2009 article by Edward Hugh on the need for a Eurozone bond + EU indecisiveness http://tinyurl.com/ybbdbjg #
Twitter Updates for 2009-12-19
- @Eirepreneur it's smurftastic 🙂 in reply to Eirepreneur #
- @EvertB does that seem like a sensible default option? don't think so in reply to EvertB #
- RT @TheLal: Plastic Logic gets $35m (total $235m) 4 e-ink display. Own #ereader Que (8x11in+3G) next mth http://bit.ly/5zZFiE #
- Engaging in a spot of genealogy #
- Don't think I'l be jumping to wordpress 2.9 until the path is a bit more worn. Reports of probs with plugins #
Who guards the guards?
My friend Jonathan recently referred me to Rate-your-solicitor.com. I admire the idea of this website. I believe that the legal profession have, in general, setup a system whereby clients are asked to pay exorbitant amounts for relatively straightforward tasks like conveyancing. They have also helpfully ensured that you hire both a solicitor AND a barrister to initiate or defend court proceedings. This raises costs and IMHO often delivers poor value to clients as the expensive barrister that you entrust to argue your case will be less familiar with it than your solicitor. A frankly silly and near feudal practice that we should have been grown-up enough to leave behind. We’ve diverged other aspects of our legal system from the UK model and in some cases it looks like we did it to spite ourselves. I feel this way about the so-called “subjective test” but that’s a digression.
Back to solicitors! There are many talented solicitors in the country who do a good job and give good advice. It’s the same as any professional really. Whatever my feelings about the costs of legal advice in this country, the outcome of any court case can never be reduced to a simple formula of “I paid a lot of money, felt I was in the right, therefore I should have won!” It just doesn’t work like that. Clients are people and people mis-recollect and mis-represent. Equally, you could get a judge on a bad day. If you don’t get exactly what you want it may not be the solicitor’s fault.
The problem I have with the aforementioned website is that you can clearly see that some complaints could be due to clients misunderstanding legal issues, being plain wrong or blaming the solicitor for the entire legal system. There are undoubtedly many insightful and reasonable criticisms on the site. However, when you look at the “Hall of Shame” you see some frankly unrelated political rants against particular solicitors. These devalue the basis for the site. They are so far off topic and perhaps defamatory they should NEVER have been published in my opinion. It’s amazing when people can be so unbalanced in their criticism that it makes you want to defend the legal profession 🙂
If you have a problem with a legal professional then complain to the law society. This involves formulating a complaint rather than a rant. You’d be amazed what might happen. Whatever people think they DO attempt to police their profession and will strike off or otherwise sanction a solicitor if they have acted unethically or unprofessionally. It would be nice, however, if they had to publicise the results of any case where their panel finds against the solicitor. That would perhaps cut out a lot of over-billing. If you’re not happy with the results from the Law Society then you could always go to the media.