{"id":383,"date":"2009-11-07T15:09:02","date_gmt":"2009-11-07T15:09:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gaisan.com\/wordp\/?p=383"},"modified":"2010-03-30T23:14:32","modified_gmt":"2010-03-30T23:14:32","slug":"cost-of-innovation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/?p=383","title":{"rendered":"Cost of Innovation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following on from my last post I&#8217;ve been thinking about what it costs to achieve and sustain innovation in an international, vast and highly competitive market. A good example is the pharmaceutical market with a worldwide market of around <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pharmafeed.com\/report-predicts-steady-growth-in-worldwide-pharmaceutical-market-in-2009\">$800 Billion USD in 2009<\/a>. I could check this figure further but the point is that it&#8217;s HUGE with US sales of around 300Bilion USD and &#8220;emerging&#8221; markets in India, China and Russia. A detailed market analysis is available <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vfa.de\/en\/statistics\/pharmaceuticalmarket\/\">here<\/a><br \/>\nSo what does it take to compete at the top of this market?  To constantly innovate, sustain a leading position in established market (e.g. the USA) and take advantage of opportunities for dramatic growth in emerging markets?  In trying to answer this question I decided to look at GlaxoSmithKline for a few reasons.  The company is among the most profitable in the business with profits of around $10.5 Billion on sales of around $40.5 Billion. GSK is headquartered in England and has around 100k employees worldwide. A major drug success (e.g. Zantac for stomach ulcer treatment) is the difference between places in the top 5 of Big Pharma and GSK is under constant pressure to out innovate it&#8217;s biggest competitors Pfizer, Novartis and Johnson&#038;Johnson. Furthermore, the difference between a new <em>blockbuster<\/em> drug being approved by the various regulatory agencies and issues being discovered during trials can be multiple years of researchers&#8217; effort, a billion dollars in research funding and the loss of billions in future revenues.  Prizer&#8217;s viagra contributes, for example, around <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sec.gov\/Archives\/edgar\/data\/78003\/000115752309006997\/a6076871ex99.htm\">half a billion USD to annual revenues<\/a> yet these sales are dwarfed by those of cardiovascular drug Lipitor selling almost 6 times that worldwide.<br \/>\nIn 2008, GSK spent \u00a33.68 Billion on Research &#038; Development as described in their annual report <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gsk.com\/investors\/reps08\/GSK-Report-2008-full.pdf\">annual report<\/a>. So that&#8217;s 4.12 Billion Euro.<br \/>\nOr to look at it another way, If we assume <a href=\"http:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/newspaper\/finance\/2009\/1030\/1224257672024.html\">51 Bn Euro of toxic debts in NAMA <\/a> with the majority of these being NPL&#8217;s issued in the wild west years from 2005 onwards we come to a startling fact. Irish Developers&#8217; misguided credit splurge could have supported a world-beating pharaceutical research company generating profits of around 8.7 Bn Euro (pre tax) per year for about <b>12 1\/2 years<\/b>. To understand why we&#8217;re still on the wrong track consider that the banks will make 255Million coupon profit on their NAMA bonds or about 1\/16th of a GSK for the privilege of getting us into this mess.<br \/>\nRelating this to <a href=\"http:\/\/chrisjhorn.wordpress.com\/2009\/10\/13\/an-irish-smart-economy-aspiration-or-reality\/\">Chris Horn&#8217;s figures<\/a> MIT would produce 5 spinouts for the NAMA bond profits alone.<br \/>\nRather than cry over the embarrassingly large amount of milk spilled it&#8217;s important to focus on the positive points. Up until the boom we arguably never had enough money to create a world beating R&#038;D organisation. Since then, we&#8217;ve invested more than enough money in this country to produce world beat companies in IT, biotech etc. We&#8217;ve just invested it in the wrong things \ud83d\ude42 It&#8217;s how we react to our mistakes that will determine whether our fate is that of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.davidmcwilliams.ie\/2006\/11\/01\/uruguay-or-switzerland\">Switzerland or Uraguay<\/a>.<br \/>\nNow we need to priortise to ensure that we create R&#038;D ventures of a critical scale AND that individuals who made money during the boom (especially &#8220;diaspora&#8221; figures and tax emigrants) invest in future R&#038;D.  I&#8217;m not exactly sure how to do this. Although I&#8217;m pretty sure that it won&#8217;t be successfully achieved by cutting pay and raising taxes of 3rd level researchers in Ireland. Just a hunch!<br \/>\nA tech bond along the lines of McWilliam&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.davidmcwilliams.ie\/2009\/09\/21\/the-past-can-save-our-future\">diaspora bond<\/a> could be an idea. The money&#8217;s out there and getting it in the form of investment is a damn sight more realistic than naieve &#8220;tax the super rich&#8221; suggestions made by people who forget that the super rich can live anywhere they like. If we can prove that our research is world class and industrially relevant then we&#8217;ll find investors. Easy to type these words, more difficult to put them into effect. Building a knowledge economy founded on high-value engineering and niche manufacturing is, perhaps, the only alternative to what some pundits call the &#8220;race to the bottom&#8221;. World Class Innovation may be the <b>only game in town<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following on from my last post I&#8217;ve been thinking about what it costs to achieve and sustain innovation in an international, vast and highly competitive market. A good example is the pharmaceutical market with a worldwide market of around $800 Billion USD in 2009. I could check this figure further but the point is that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[76,1720,78],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=383"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":677,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/383\/revisions\/677"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}