{"id":35,"date":"2004-11-11T11:39:28","date_gmt":"2004-11-11T11:39:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gaisan.com\/wordp\/?p=35"},"modified":"2004-11-11T11:39:28","modified_gmt":"2004-11-11T11:39:28","slug":"right-to-bear-arms-or-is-there","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/?p=35","title":{"rendered":"Right to Bear Arms (or is there?)"},"content":{"rendered":"

We all know that the American consitution protects citizens rights to bear arms. Wrong! It’s a bit more subtle than that. The 2nd amendments actually reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”<\/i>. There is much debate about whether this amendment only applies to state sanctioned militias (whatever they might be in the event of civil-war?) However, we can all agree that there’s quite a difference<\/a> when the 1st<\/sup> half of the amendment is included. So while organisations like the National Rifle Association (NRA)<\/i> have done their best to popularise the myth that the 2nd amendment is an unlimited excuse to buy an automatic assault rifle for hunting deer or family protection<\/i> their claims are actually quite tenuous. The US supreme court has deemed that this amendment applies to federal law only, doesn’t affect gun-control laws passed by individual states and actually “means no more than (the right to keep and bear arms) shall not be infringed by Congress”<\/i>. For all you legal buffs out there, this ruling was passed almost 130 years ago in 1876 (United States v. Cruikshank)<\/i>. This was reaffirmed ten years later in Presser v. Illinois<\/i>. Various state gun control laws have been upheld based on these decisions for years. In 1980 the Supreme Court again presented the opinion that “these legislative restrictions on the use of firearms do not trench upon any constitutionally protected liberties”. So American’s don’t have the right to bear arms? It’s a myth right? Unfortunately after over a hundred years of consistency in interpretation of this amendment the US supreme court executive branch (including former AG John Ashcroft) presented THEIR INTERPRETATION<\/b> in 2002 that the 2nd amendment DOES in fact protect the US citizens right to own guns. This doesn’t necessarily obviate gun-control or personal responsibility in the choice of gun(s) owned. Indeed according to the most recent pre-election harris poll in 2004 a slim majority of 52% favour tougher gun control laws<\/a>.
\nUp until 2002, however, this supposed “right to bear arms” was actually a bit of a myth and flew in the face of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the 2nd<\/sup> amendment. It may be a moot point as 73% of american’s agreed (in 2002)<\/a> with the sentiment of their “consitutional right to bear arms”<\/i>. Big enough lie, often enough etc…<\/i><\/b>
\nThere are arguments against gun control<\/a> aswell. Some of these seem plausible enough, others are downright paranoid and jefferson’s quote<\/a> about using firearms as a last resort to protect themselves from the tyranny of the goverment is bogus and can be filed neatly in my drawer marked right-wing, gun toting, self-justifying propaganda<\/i>. If only this was just a drawer… This file gets any bigger I’m gonna need a new house.
\nI can’t help feel that the 2002 reinterpretation of the 2nd<\/sup> amendment is commentary du-jour<\/i> and will not stand the test of time. The text of the amendment hasn’t been amended<\/i> \ud83d\ude09 and it’s fair to say that the 2002 interpretation doesn’t sit easy with many lawyers in the US. Check out the excellent overlawyered.com<\/a> for information on this and other aspects of US legal practice. Stunning and shocking in equal measure.
\nAlso check out the useful summary of gun control in the US here<\/a>
\nThanks to Kieran Colfer for the debate and the link. You’re as sharp as ever! Mind like that oughta be subject to some kind of state legislation to keep you from hurtin’ yourself, boy! \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We all know that the American consitution protects citizens rights to bear arms. Wrong! It’s a bit more subtle than that. The 2nd amendments actually reads: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”. There is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=35"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=35"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=35"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=35"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}