{"id":208,"date":"2006-05-05T09:50:12","date_gmt":"2006-05-05T09:50:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gaisan.com\/wordp\/?p=208"},"modified":"2010-03-30T23:09:37","modified_gmt":"2010-03-30T23:09:37","slug":"the-monty-hall-problem-the-numbers-dont-lie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/?p=208","title":{"rendered":"The Monty Hall problem &#8211; The numbers don&#8217;t lie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve filed this in science as it&#8217;s basically a mathematical conundrum. I was chatting about this subtle problem with R last night. She&#8217;s a self-confessed numbers phobic but interested in how the world works. I worship at the altar of Phi and am perfectly willing to believe a logical mathematical prediction even if it flies in the face of a more immediate intuition. The Monty Hall problem is called after the presenter of a 60s\/70s game show called &#8220;Let&#8217;s Make a Deal&#8221;. It&#8217;s a weaker version of the 3 prisoners problem and is generally stated as<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Suppose you&#8217;re on a game show, and you&#8217;re given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what&#8217;s behind the doors, opens another door, say No. 3, which has a goat. He then says to you, &#8220;Do you want to pick door No. 2?&#8221; Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We&#8217;re also asked to assume that the host is honest, the show isn&#8217;t rigged, we have no prior knowledge of the appearance of the goat and a whole bunch of other <em>&#8220;butterfly wings&#8221;<\/em> that could influence the result in any way. The answer is that it IS to your advantage to switch doors. For example if you pick door A and the host shows you a goat behind door C your first pick was made with a probability of 1 in 3 of correctly identifying the one door with the car behind it from 3 equally advantageous probabilities. The mistake that most people (almost everyone) seems to make is that they then misunderstand the probabilistic basis for switching. I also don&#8217;t particularly like the Goat-1,Goat-2 explanation presented by some including professional smart person <a href=\"http:\/\/www.marilynvossavant.com\/\">Marilyn Vos Savant<\/a>.<br \/>\nWhen A was picked I had a 1\/3 chance of finding a car but I had a 2\/3 chance of finding a goat. I suppose it depends on how you feel about goats but I&#8217;m indifferent and would prefer a car. The resale value is generally higher, unless it&#8217;s an Alfa of course! Changing to door B doesn&#8217;t have a 2\/3 chance of finding a goat. There&#8217;s only one goat left. Damn, I&#8217;ve halved my chances of finding a goat. So let&#8217;s let the probability that switching to door B is a good by P(SwitchB).<br \/>\n<code>P(SwitchB) = P(A was a goat) = 1 - (1\/3) = 2\/3<\/code><br \/>\nThe probability that switching is a good idea is DIRECTLY affected by the probability the first choice was a goat. You can&#8217;t ignore the past and must treat the problem as a continuation of the same game. This in itself makes sense but for several reasons our brains find it difficult to combine temporal and logical context and we get a bit confused.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve filed this in science as it&#8217;s basically a mathematical conundrum. I was chatting about this subtle problem with R last night. She&#8217;s a self-confessed numbers phobic but interested in how the world works. I worship at the altar of Phi and am perfectly willing to believe a logical mathematical prediction even if it flies [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1701],"tags":[83,84],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=208"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":671,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208\/revisions\/671"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}