{"id":12964,"date":"2005-12-28T19:19:29","date_gmt":"2005-12-28T19:19:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/?p=12964"},"modified":"2005-12-28T19:19:29","modified_gmt":"2005-12-28T19:19:29","slug":"re-review-of-docs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/?p=12964","title":{"rendered":"RE: Review of docs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hi Anthony,<br \/>\nI appreciate that the docs are at an early stage but most investors will<br \/>\nwant a 15-20 pager on the project with a 2-3 page additional executive<br \/>\nsummary. I&#8217;m not sure that the proposed business plan format is appropriate.<\/p>\n<p>Also, much of the website content is a bit too evangelical for my liking.<br \/>\nThings are said without necessarily being backed up. The CUBOS approach has<br \/>\nnot been clearly described anywhere.<br \/>\nI&#8217;ll have a look at it. Also, some things are very unclear to me at this<br \/>\nstage:<\/p>\n<p>1) who&#8217;s involved? (contributors, investors, sponsors etc.)<br \/>\nThe group on MSN looks quite small when compared with the complexity of the<br \/>\ntask)<br \/>\n2) what their roles are?<br \/>\n3) what their motives are?<\/p>\n<p>Also, there are a hell of a lot of management tools that are much better<br \/>\nthan MSN Groups. I&#8217;d adopt something like Moregroupware with project<br \/>\nplanning, task management etc. We&#8217;ve done deployments for various IST<br \/>\nprojects. E.g. http:\/\/www.securitytaskforce.org\/ <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether I&#8217;m supposed to be suggesting people, organisations<br \/>\netc. However, my ability to make these suggestions is being impaired by<br \/>\noutstanding questions about the who where what how of Cubos technology and<br \/>\norganisation. Also, it certainly appears like there is a lot to do at this<br \/>\nstage. For example, the following page<br \/>\n(http:\/\/www.mxglobal.org\/CubosSJ6\/faq.htm) revealed much about the operation<br \/>\nof Cubos, Vector and Vectra. I&#8217;d love to know exactly how much of this has<br \/>\nbeen achieved. Many of the copyrights say 2002 so what exactly is in place<br \/>\nfor Jan 2006?<\/p>\n<p>However, based on what I&#8217;ve read so far. I have the following comments.<br \/>\n1) what webservice technologies are being used? Is there a SOAP interface<br \/>\nand is the REST paradigm used for service composition?<br \/>\nIs Vector technology licensable in itself? Where can I download a toolkit &amp;<br \/>\nis the source open?<br \/>\nCan my developers work on it using J2EE or .Net technologies? Has it been<br \/>\nsecurity auditted? Is it a true Grid with pooled hardware and software<br \/>\nresources gaining time-share across a networked system based on application<br \/>\ncontext?<br \/>\n2) Is MX2 not just another intermediate setting itself up a global exchange<br \/>\nlike the commodities exchanges described in the FAQ. Is this basically an<br \/>\neBay for services where businesses can effectively outsource a range of<br \/>\nback-office activities to a trusted provider? Sj6 seems to be&#8230;<br \/>\n3) Different jurisdictions will have different legal terms &amp; conditions for<br \/>\nCubos services. How do you propose getting around this?<br \/>\n4) Similar to 3, how do you ensure social equity of community members. How<br \/>\nis Cubos resistant to corruption &amp; abuse? Ian Clarke (Irish lad who created<br \/>\nfreenet) has long argued that anonymity should be protected to ensure<br \/>\nfreedom of speech and communication. In business situations legal contracts<br \/>\nare put in place to enable process and task outsourcing. However, where will<br \/>\nliability lie within Cubos? How is liability limited across different<br \/>\njurisdictions? Will insurance products be available for services users.<br \/>\nArguably escrow services helped eBay gain acceptance. Dispute resolutions in<br \/>\ncommercial contracts is often expensive.<br \/>\n5) How will trust be gained? Should you start with basic services like<br \/>\nfax-to-email and other such low-level vertical services and then work you&#8217;re<br \/>\nway up the stack. The problem with many regional skill exchanges currently<br \/>\nin existence are unrealistic expectations about price &amp; complexity on the<br \/>\npart of both customers and suppliers and a proliferation of smaller<br \/>\nlower-value entities due to lack of trust and concerns about organisational<br \/>\nstability etc.<br \/>\n6) If San Juan is operational why are there no performance figures available<br \/>\nfor this project? Perhaps there are but I couldn&#8217;t find any. <\/p>\n<p>Some of the goals are very ambitious but I would recommend studying the<br \/>\nfollowing information about telecomms information modelling as many of the<br \/>\nproblems you describe have been solved by a friend of mine, John Strassner,<br \/>\nfor commercial telecomms OSS deployments.<br \/>\nhttp:\/\/www.tmforum.org\/browse.asp?catID=2008<br \/>\nIMHO SID is the bible as it&#8217;s the most complete management information model<br \/>\non the planet. The benefits of using an accepted information model are<br \/>\nmanifold but here are some<br \/>\n1) availability of sophisticated, open and commercial management tools which<br \/>\nwill be deployed and tested in real-world commercial environments such as<br \/>\ntelecommunications networks.<br \/>\n2) availability of profiles and policies for most commercial services which<br \/>\nwill manage network and service infrastructure. E.g. VoIP over VPN profile<br \/>\ngiving guaranteed QoS between project partners. <\/p>\n<p>I also recommend studying information about different connection paradigms<br \/>\nfrom IONA and Intel <\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/www.intel.com\/cd\/ids\/developer\/asmo-na\/eng\/57606.htm?page=4<br \/>\nConnection brokerages and connectivity orchestrators enable information<br \/>\npassage to be prioritised using middleware and management tools. Simply put,<br \/>\nthe guy with the WiFi laptop will be told that he needs to upload files in a<br \/>\ntimely fashion if he hasn&#8217;t already serendipitously transmitted files<br \/>\nthrough an accepting hotpot. This kind of Just-in-Time data comms is as<br \/>\nvital to supporting virtual organisations as any other element. However, you<br \/>\nstill need a global reference model for all entities within your system and<br \/>\na management system that can interpret and enforce policies across complex<br \/>\nand multifacetted tasks. <\/p>\n<p>I guess it will all become clearer as I read through the comments on the<br \/>\nlist. <\/p>\n<p>Regards, <\/p>\n<p>\t&#8230;shane<\/p>\n<p>\/\/=============================<br \/>\n\/\/ Shane Dempsey<br \/>\n\/\/ Managing Director,<br \/>\n\/\/ Gaisan Technologies Ltd.<br \/>\n\/\/ e: sdempsey@gaisan.com<br \/>\n\/\/ u: http:\/\/www.gaisan.com<br \/>\n\/\/ t: +353 (0)51 304224<br \/>\n\/\/=============================<\/p>\n<p>&gt; &#8212;&#8211;Original Message&#8212;&#8211;<br \/>\n&gt; From: anthony brown [mailto:periclesbrown@hotmail.com]<br \/>\n&gt; Sent: 28 December 2005 15:26<br \/>\n&gt; To: sdempsey@gaisan.com<br \/>\n&gt; Cc: mpickelny@yahoo.com; cubos@groups.msn.com<br \/>\n&gt; Subject: RE: Review of docs<br \/>\n&gt;<br \/>\n&gt; Yep- we look forward to the questions, Shane&#8230;..ignore the documents,<br \/>\n&gt; just<br \/>\n&gt; read the messages +<br \/>\n&gt; the &#8220;model&#8221; web-site carefully. Try not to ask questions already answered<br \/>\n&gt; in<br \/>\n&gt; those 2 places.<br \/>\n&gt; See ya later,<br \/>\n&gt; Anthony<br \/>\n&gt;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;From: &#8220;Shane Michael Dempsey&#8221;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;To: &#8220;&#8216;anthony brown'&#8221;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;Subject: Review of docs<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:37:44 -0000<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;Hi Anthony,<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;I&#8217;m reviewing the docs the project has produced so far. I&#8217;ll send you a<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;longer email when I get the chance but I have lots of questions.<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;Sincerest regards,<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;<br \/>\n&gt; &gt;\t&#8230;shane<br \/>\n&gt;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hi Anthony, I appreciate that the docs are at an early stage but most investors will want a 15-20 pager on the project with a 2-3 page additional executive summary. I&#8217;m not sure that the proposed business plan format is appropriate. Also, much of the website content is a bit too evangelical for my liking. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12964"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=12964"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12964\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=12964"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=12964"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gaisan.com\/blogs\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=12964"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}